The new-look London King's Cross
So, with the help of a friend with access to actual arrival figures, I looked at yesterday's London King's Cross arrivals for trains that had called at Peterborough on their journey in. There are a total of 90 trains in question, operated by East Coast and First Capital Connect. Services operated by Grand Central, First Hull Trains and East Coast services that pass through Peterborough were omitted.
Taking East Coast first, the TOC's 48 arrivals averaged at 3.52 minutes early. The train recording the latest arrival was 1A36, the 1445 ex Leeds, which turned up 5 minutes late. The train which recorded the earliest arrival was 1Y53, the 2115 ex Newcastle, which terminated 14 minutes early.
One of East Coast's HSTs (Photo: Steve Drury)
These figures are very encouraging. They also appear to be unrepresentative from personal experience. There were some very telling examples of how additional time is given to trains on the last leg of their route from Peterborough so that any delay has a good chance of being disguised by the extra minutes built into the timetable. It was commonplace to see trains from Newcastle running between 6-7 minutes late yet recording a 4-minutes-early arrival in London. While a 6-7 minute delay is, under the current recording method, not considered late, to all but those running the trains would consider it to be so.
The company, however, had an excellent day overall. It would take too much time to look at every station along the ECML and record the actual punctuality of trains at, say, Doncaster, but I can say with some certainty it would not be as high as the average 3.52 minutes early arrival in London.
Turning to FCC, the TOC's 42 arrivals averaged 0.19 minutes early. The train recording the latest arrival was 2P63, the 1015 ex Peterborough, which arrived 15 minutes late after developing a fault with the train. The earliest arrival was 2P99, the 0325 ex Peterborough, which arrived 6 minutes early. Understandably, with more stations en route to London south of Peterborough, FCC services are highly regulated, unlike East Coast's, which can effectively travel as fast as the signallers permit them. Unlike East Coast, however, FCC was able to see a higher number of trains arrive at exactly the same time as the timetable - 7 in total (0749, 1004, 1022, 1044, 1701, 1802 and 1856).
FCC uses, in the main, Class 365s between Peterborough and King's Cross. (Photo: Peterborough Today)
In summary, the ECML and its two busiest operators had an excellent day yesterday. Is it representative? No! It most certainly is not. Often delays are beyond the control of the TOCs when infrastructure fails or vandalism takes place. Yesterday, however, saw a rare glimpse of that which operators, the DfT and Network Rail would like us to think will become the norm, in time. And I hope it will. I certainly wasn't going to shy away from revealing my case study just because the data was not as I'd expected it to be. Well done to all concerned.
The only thing I'll add is that the Working Timetable has not been considered. The actual arrival times have been related to the public timetable, not the working timetable. Comparing actual arrivals with the working timetable shows a slightly different picture: East Coast's 3.52 average early arrival drops to 0.33 and FCC's 0.19 average early arrival reduces to an average delay of 0.30 minutes. TOCs would argue comparing actual punctuality to the working timetable is pointless as the public is unaware of it, so why use it? Not one single East Coast arrival in King's Cross has the same public and working timetable time. In FCC's favour 24 of their 42 arrivals from Peterborough do have the same public and working timetable time.